The Hero Of Con Air :: essays research papers

The HeroThe movie convict Air is a motivational movie. It is an action movie that discharge appeal to al intimately anyone. There are many factors in this movie and when combined all together, they give the movie a sense of unity. The theme and the take are similar and are intended to attract a wide variety of viewers.The main theme of Con Air is heroism. Of course, as in most movies, the main character of Con Air displays many heroic acts. Cameron Poe is stuck on a plane transporting hardened criminals. The criminals take over the plane, forcing Poe to play the hero and that the fucking day as he so delicately puts it. For example, when Johnny 23, a serial rapist, attacks a woman guard in attempt to replace his name to Johnny 24, Poe stands up and refuses to let the rape occur. Poe also displays his courage by refusing to give up or get off the plane until he successfully saves the innocent lives on board. Poe is not the only hero. Vince Larkin, an officer of the law also disp lays many acts of courage. He refuses to shoot the plane down because of the innocent victims on board. Another prisoner, Garland Green, a brutal serial killer, displays more courage. When he comes across a young girl playing alone outside her house, he has a chance to turn her into a victim. But, remarkably, he does her no harm. Not the typical heroic act, yet it still applies.Similar to the theme of heroism, is the purpose of Con Air. The purpose of this movie is to inspire people to do the right thing even when stuck in the worst environment. And what could be worse than Poes environment. As he describes it, They in some manner managed to get every creep and freak in the universe on this one plane, and then somehow managed to let them take it over and somehow managed to stick us right smack in the middle. Yet he still manages to repair the damage done. Garland Green was also place in a vulnerable position, and he somehow manages to refrain from his killer instincts. These acts o f heroism within the theme are effectively used to portray the purpose of inspiration. number together the theme, purpose, and plot of this movie, and the total would create an effective movie with the capability of attracting a large audience.

Not All is Cheerless, Dark and Deadly in Shakespeares King Lear Essay

Not All is Cheerless, distressing and Deadly in fairy Lear Alls Cheerless, Dark and Deadly Are Kents Words a Fair Summary of The Tragedy of King Lear? Samuel pratson asserted that the blinding of Gloucester was an act too horrid to be endured in a hammy exhibition, and that he was too shocked by the death of Cordelia to read the play again until he was given the task of editing it.1 Nor was Dr Johnson al oneness in finding himself unable to remain firm the violence and app arent injustices that unfold in King Lear. The 18th century certainly found the play all cheerless and preferred Nahum Tates 1681 watered-down version of Shakespeares original. King Lear is a injustice play, with the near triumph of the malcontent Edmund, the intense sufferings of Lear and Gloucester, and the seeming lack of justice at the pieces conclusion. Shakespeare locates his tragedy in an extreme and entropic universe that makes his reference uncomfortable, and indeed is hypothetic to. On its own, the sheer violence of Act III.7 bears witness to Kents nihilistic utterance at the plays close. However, Lears universe, as I have just stated, is one of extremes, and not just now negative ones. As A.C. Bradley notes There is in the world of King Lear the same abundance of extreme good as of extreme evil. It generates in profusion self-less obedience and unconquerable love.2 The play contains a cluster of characters that are unequivocally good. Kent, for instance, is a paradigm of devotion. In Act I.I he is publicly insulted and humiliated. In spite of Lears threats, Kent ashes determined to serve his master, even braving the storm to be near him. Cordelia too, is traduced and punished by Lear, and yet she is the... ... condemned to short lives - nor live so long. Edgars apogee words are disturbingly equivocal. They allude to the antithesis constantly at work in the play a mixture of hope and despair. Perhaps the couplet is lastly nihilistic, and the play as a whole e qually so. Redemption remains unattained. However, while I would agree that Kents words that Alls cheerless, dark and deadly may be the overthrow message of the tragedy, I do not believe that King Lear can be simply summed up in such(prenominal) a comment. To do such a social occasion would be to see the drama two-dimensionally to ignore the world of polarities, of good as well as evil, which Shakespeare creates in which to hold his play. Works Cited 1 Johnson as Critic, ed. John Wain, Routledge & Kegan Paul 1973, pp. 216-217 2 A. C. Bradley, Shakespearian Tragedy, Macmillan 1908, pp. 304 -305 Not All is Cheerless, Dark and Deadly in Shakespeares King Lear EssayNot All is Cheerless, Dark and Deadly in King Lear Alls Cheerless, Dark and Deadly Are Kents Words a Fair Summary of The Tragedy of King Lear? Samuel Johnson asserted that the blinding of Gloucester was an act too horrid to be endured in a dramatic exhibition, and that he was too shocked by the dea th of Cordelia to read the play again until he was given the task of editing it.1 Nor was Dr Johnson alone in finding himself unable to stomach the violence and apparent injustices that unfold in King Lear. The 18th century certainly found the play all cheerless and preferred Nahum Tates 1681 watered-down version of Shakespeares original. King Lear is a dark play, with the near triumph of the malcontent Edmund, the intense sufferings of Lear and Gloucester, and the seeming lack of justice at the pieces conclusion. Shakespeare locates his tragedy in an extreme and entropic universe that makes his audience uncomfortable, and indeed is supposed to. On its own, the sheer violence of Act III.7 bears witness to Kents nihilistic utterance at the plays close. However, Lears universe, as I have just stated, is one of extremes, and not merely negative ones. As A.C. Bradley notes There is in the world of King Lear the same abundance of extreme good as of extreme evil. It generates in profu sion self-less devotion and unconquerable love.2 The play contains a cluster of characters that are unequivocally good. Kent, for instance, is a paradigm of devotion. In Act I.I he is publicly insulted and humiliated. In spite of Lears threats, Kent remains determined to serve his master, even braving the storm to be near him. Cordelia too, is traduced and punished by Lear, and yet she is the... ... condemned to short lives - nor live so long. Edgars closing words are disturbingly equivocal. They allude to the antithesis constantly at work in the play a mixture of hope and despair. Perhaps the couplet is ultimately nihilistic, and the play as a whole equally so. Redemption remains unattained. However, while I would agree that Kents words that Alls cheerless, dark and deadly may be the overriding message of the tragedy, I do not believe that King Lear can be simply summed up in such a comment. To do such a thing would be to see the drama two-dimensionally to ignore the world of po larities, of good as well as evil, which Shakespeare creates in which to hold his play. Works Cited 1 Johnson as Critic, ed. John Wain, Routledge & Kegan Paul 1973, pp. 216-217 2 A. C. Bradley, Shakespearian Tragedy, Macmillan 1908, pp. 304 -305